Deluge dont download a file

If so, try reducing the total connections allowed in Deluge, or increasing the tolerance on the router, or turning off SYN flood detection. Also check local storage for the downloaded file is not out of space shown on bottom status bar in Deluge UI. To use a Samba share in Deluge from within Windows, the share has to be mapped to a drive letter. The libtorrent version is in the output of Deluge Version.

Note: debug is very verbose and with a lot of torrents log files will be MB's in size. The mind roams more freely in empty rooms. So it's an upstream issue. I have made a personal commitment not to reply in topics that start with a lowercase letter.

Proper grammar and punctuation is a sign of respect, and if you do not show any, you will NOT receive any help at least not from me. I've just add a torrent that I downloaded before to seed. But Deluge don't check the data, it started to download from begining. Now, deluge has many bug, considering a move to qBittorrent. It downloads to the home directory by default. That's why it doesn't check your data.

I think it's related to the glibc migration, because it started around the middle of July. What pisses me off is that it still hasn't been fixed!

I only wanted one and set the other three to 'Do Not Download'. I got the file I wanted and in addition to that I got 0. Use Full Allocation is set. I do have to say that deluge looks pretty slick. Re: BUG: "Do not download" of simple files Post by g0nad » Thu Jul 23, am Just to confirm I removed that torrent and data and readded it with the same selection, exactly the same result.

It is a bug. Instead of getting it behave how the user would expect there's a FAQ entry essentially telling users to lump it. If a file is not requested by the user it should not be created. Re: BUG: "Do not download" of simple files Post by loki » Sun Jul 26, pm It's not a bug if there's nothing that can be done about it, all other torrent programs suffer from this same so called 'bug'. I've got utorrent kicking round, I'll refresh my memory and test out its behavior - can't say I've seen it do the same.